Leveling the Playing Field for all California Hospitals and Health Care Consumers by Rejecting Anti Competition Practices of Sutter Health


Leveling the Playing Field for all California Hospitals and Health Care Consumers by Rejecting Anti Competition Practices of Sutter Health

WHEREAS California has seen a surge in provider consolidation under Sutter Health, who has acquired competitors, outpatient facilities, and physician practices under the promise of lower cost and efficiency, but instead consumers have experienced prices at Sutter Health increasing 43 percent faster than at other hospitals because of their market power, costing on average $4,000 more per admission to seek the same services than at all other California hospitals; and

WHEREAS Sutter Health has used their market power to become even more dominant and prevent consumers from challenging their impacts through  “All or nothing” clauses requiring payers to take all hospitals in a system or none, frequently by requiring payers to pay significantly more than the law provides to those hospitals that are excluded—making it impossible to provide an adequate network for consumers without agreeing to Sutter Health’s excessive rates where lower cost competitors may exist; and

WHEREAS by tying hospitals together, dominant providers like Sutter Health are able to achieve market power over prices beyond any local market advantages, and then use “gag clauses” to prevent employer groups from sharing pricing data that could encourage more cost-effective care for their employees;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the California Democratic Party supports reforms on behalf of consumers and health care providers to remedy the unfair exercise of Sutter Health market power which has resulted in reduced competition, increased prices, and less affordable access to coverage and premiums for health insurance are about 25% higher in Northern California, on average, than in the southern part of the state; and

AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the California Democratic Party supports reforms that would prohibit any contract between a hospital and a health care service plan from engaging in anti-competitive practices by setting payment rates or other terms for affiliates of the hospitals not included in the agreement, requiring the health plan to contract with all affiliates of the hospital, forcing employers to attest that they are bound by the terms of the contract between the hospital and the health plan, mandating that a health care service plan submit to binding arbitration for antitrust claims as a condition of contracting, or requiring that the health plan provide coverage to its enrollees at the same level of copayment, coinsurance or deductible at affiliated hospitals.

Sponsored by California Labor Federation; Northern California Carpenters Regional Council; United Food and Commercial Workers; Controller Hilary Crosby; CDP Region 2 Director Craig Cheslog; CDP Region 3; CDP Region 5; CDP Region 6 Director Hene Kelly; Alameda County Democratic Central Committee; Yolo County Democratic Party; San Joaquin County Democratic Central Committee Chair Max Vargas; Solano County DCC Chair Brigette Hunley; Stanislaus County Democratic Central Committee, Chair Dr. Harinder Grewal; four waters, Assembly District 7; Anna Molander, Assembly District 7; Brian Leubitz, Assembly District 17; Brian Webster, Assembly District 17; Maureen Dugan, AD 19; Wendy Bloom, AD15; Benjamin Becker, AD17; Katrina Bergstrom, AD43; Elizabeth Castillo, AD 63; Rochelle Pardue-Okimoto, AD15; Susana Williams, AD 11; Catherine Willott, AD44; Linda Bassett, AD64; San Diego County DCC

Adopted by the California Democratic Party
At its 2017 Statewide Convention
Sacramento Convention Center

We need you to be a part of the California Democratic Party's blue wave by Donating Every Month between now and the 2020 Election! LEARN MORE

Stay Informed